Abiy Ahmed’s Speech: A Delusional Threat to Peace

Abiy Ahmed’s latest parliamentary speech is not mere political theater — it is a dangerous escalation. His invocation of demographic conquest, his demand for Port of Assab, and his imperial posturing are not just offensive, they are destabilizing.
This is not diplomacy. It is a declaration of intent to violate international borders and erase hard-won sovereignty.
To speak of Eritrea as “sparsely populated” and therefore ripe for absorption is genocidal logic dressed in nationalist bravado. It echoes the darkest chapters of colonial expansion, where land was measured not by law or justice, but by the imagined entitlement of empire.
Eritrea: Sovereignty Forged in Fire
Eritrea is not a province. It is not a bargaining chip. It is a nation forged through decades of resistance, sacrifice, and unyielding dignity. Every inch of its territory — every port, every village, every mountain — carries the memory of those who refused to be erased.
Port Assab is not up for negotiation. It is not Ethiopia’s to dream about, threaten, or “reclaim.” It belongs to Eritrea, and any attempt to seize it would be met with fierce resistance — not just from Eritreans, but from all Red Sea countries and from history itself.
Madness in the Halls of Power
Abiy’s self-styling as the “7th king” is not visionary — it is delusional. His speech reveals a man intoxicated by myth, not guided by reason. He stands naked before the world, stripped of legitimacy, truth, and strategic clarity.
His hallucinations about birth rates and territorial expansion are not policy — they are symptoms of a collapsing political project.
The Prosperity Party (PP) is not building a future; it is grasping at fantasies. And Eritrea will not be dragged into their fever dream.
History Has Already Spoken
History has judged those who mistake arrogance for destiny. From Mussolini to Mengistu, the Horn of Africa has buried many who tried to redraw its map with blood and bluster.
Eritrea’s liberation was not a gift — it was earned. And it will not be undone by parliamentary tantrums or demographic threats.
A Call to Eritreans and Allies
This moment demands vigilance, unity, and principled defiance. Eritreans and their allies must:
- Expose the lies: Counter Abiy’s revisionism with historical facts and legal truths.
- Amplify Eritrean sovereignty and territorial integrity.
Eritreans — at home and abroad — are prepared for all scenarios. Political madness often precedes military miscalculation. Eritrea will remain vigilant.
Eritrea’s independence is not a footnote in someone else’s mythology — it is a hard-won reality, rooted in truth, dignity, and international law.
Related stories

Opinion Piece Published on Jerusalem Post by Dr Shmuel Legesse on 15 March 2026 – A Response
An opinion piece titled, "Middle East's future may be decided in the Horn of Africa : The Red Sea is becoming the centre of global power." was published on #JerusalemPost on 15 March by Dr Shmuel Legesse . The author is an international educator, community activist, a diplomacy

Beyond the Propaganda: Wode Maya, Eritrea, and the Reality of African Sovereignty
It happens every time. A content creator lands in Asmara, camera in hand, expecting a dystopian wasteland. They come armed with the same exhausted Western propaganda—the “North Korea of Africa” label, dutifully slapped onto a YouTube title to appease the algorithm. Recently, the

The World Cannot Afford a Second Maritime Meltdown in the Red Sea
As the Strait of Hormuz buckles under the weight of war, a reckless axis of actors—driven by Abu Dhabi and executed by its clients in Addis Ababa—threatens to turn the Horn of Africa into a global economic catastrophe. At a moment when the Strait of Hormuz is already under severe

Ethiopia: Abiy's War Script and the Media’s False Balance on Eritrea
The lazy framing is already being warmed up: “tensions are rising,” “neighbours trade claims,” “both sides must de-escalate.” It sounds responsible. It reads balanced. And it quietly deletes the one fact that matters: one side has spent years normalising war talk as policy. If y

