The Mesob Journal
banner

Ethiopian Soldiers Are Crying. The Regime Is Collapsing.

By Ternafi03 min read
Ethiopian Soldiers Are Crying. The Regime Is Collapsing.
Composite: Screenshots of Abiy Ahmed soldiers protesting by crying.

A line on X shouldn’t carry this much weight. But Ethiopian prominent activist Jawar Mohammed’s post does, because it does what official talking points can’t: it shows a country’s breaking point in minutes of raw, human grief. “Ethiopian soldiers have begun posting videos of themselves crying on social media… expressing their desire to end the country’s civil wars.” The clips are spreading because they’re simple, risky, and true. Risky—because soldiers who spoke for peace before were punished, even executed. True—because the videos don’t argue; they testify. 

Let’s be clear about what these images mean. Soldiers don’t cry on camera when a war is going well. They do it when the mission is incoherent, the costs are unbearable, and the chain of command is feared, not trusted. Ethiopia has lived under a revolving door of states of emergency and crackdowns on dissent—patterns documented for years by rights groups and, more recently, again in 2024–2025. That matters here: when peaceful expression is met with raids, detentions, and reprisals, people talk to the only court left—the court of public conscience. 

And the context? The country isn’t just at war; it is exhausted by war. After Tigray, the Amhara front reignited with mass abuses reported by international media and rights organizations—door-to-door executions, civilians shot in cold blood, drone attacks, a war consuming local life and national legitimacy. This is the ambient reality the soldiers are filming through tears. 

Meanwhile, the economy that was sold as the “home-grown miracle” has hit the wall. Ethiopia defaulted on its only Eurobond in late 2023. This week, talks with bondholders collapsed again, with creditors publicly weighing legal action amid a restructuring impasse. A government that can’t end a war also can’t convince markets it can pay its bills. That’s not rhetoric — it’s the simple arithmetic of default.

Inflation doesn’t look tamer at all — after years of 20–35% price surges, the cost of living remains unbearable and wages haven’t caught up. Households feel the shocks in food, fuel, and the currency’s slide; propaganda of “improving” inflation doesn’t fill an empty pantry. Even the “reform” narrative can’t hide infrastructure gaps: by 2025, the World Bank notes roughly 65% of Ethiopians have access to some source of electricity, often intermittent and off-grid—meaning tens of millions remain in the dark or endure weekly blackouts. War drains budgets; citizens pay in candles.

So when soldiers cry in silence, they’re not performing. They’re indicting. Their message is brutally simple:

  • No coherent end-state. Endless “security operations” with shifting enemies and no political exit produce trauma, desertion, and moral injury.
  • No economic oxygen. Default, donor distrust, and an opaque restructuring track spook investors and crush household resilience. 
  • No safe speech. Years of documented crackdowns on critics—journalists, activists, and ordinary citizens—tell soldiers that even pleas for peace can be fatal. Hence the silent tears. 

This is what regime rot looks like from the inside: an army that can still fight, but no longer believes. Command can force movement; it cannot manufacture meaning. And when meaning dies, ultimate collapse follows.

Abiy Ahmed’s government can claim “progress” and point to selective statistics. But the most honest metric in Ethiopia today is a soldier’s tear. It measures the distance between propaganda and reality, between a war’s official purpose and its lived outcome.

To Ethiopia’s soldiers: your grief isn’t weakness. It’s testimony.
To Ethiopia’s leaders: if you ignore it, you’ll lose more than a bond negotiation. You’ll lose the country.

← Back to Ethiopia

Your Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and show relevant content. You can accept all, reject non‑essential, or manage preferences.